The Biophilia Project (awed by nature)
This is the communication forum for The Theory of Biophilia and the Biophilia Project

Home » Public Forums » Current Project: environmental amensalism » Outline and chat for first article...
Re: Outline and chat for first article... [message #8 is a reply to message #7] Fri, 02 June 2017 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
admin is currently offline  admin
Messages: 10
Registered: March 2017
Junior Member
Administrator
Three tests
===========
Achievement (success) scale after a task
Growth of compassion after a task
Change in sense of locus of control after a task (dominion, SDO, etc)

We will propose that how we see and treat the environment is highly correlated with how we see our own body (temple - but see Muir). Extend Costello (how we see animals affects how we see each other)

Group 1: must ask its right hand permission every time the mind wants it to do soemthing. Someone else (a confederate) will act on behalf of the hand (out of view, like Milgram). This will be our experimental control (we know how the hand will respond; the subject doesn't)

The Ss must achieve some well-known task, using a well known scale to measure progress.
Therefore, how the hand responds matters to "success". This will be our "mutual benefit" control (well, mutual agreement for now - consensus)

We will have subjects do the other hand too (left hand). This way we can use a "within group" variable (chirality) and a between groups variable (the hand's unknowable response). We can then swap which hand is controlled by a "no trespassing" owner (the Ss or a confederate). And the Ss won't know.

Other scales: we will also do a test that measures "other compassion" (see scales) against a separable concept (for discriminant validity and independence of observations). We will also do a test that measures any change (perturbation, interruption) in the sense of locus of control (see scales)

Assumptions:
When the hand is fully compliant, success will be highest
When the hand is fully compliant, tested allo-compassion will be lowest (like an A1C test, over time, expectation of compliance not consensus)
When the hand is fully compliant, locus of control will exhibit least change

When the hand is least compliant, success will be lowest
When the hand is least compliant, tested allo-compassion will be highest (if success is decent too), else success will be low because the two cannot reach consensus
When the hand is least compliant, locus of control will exhibit most change (stress)

The Ss must achieve some well-known task, using a well known scale to measure progress.
Therefore, how the hand responds matters to "success". This will be our "mutual benefit" control (well, mutual agreement for now - consensus). For benefit to truly figure in, the hand must benefit in a non mental way.
 
Read Message icon1.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Next Topic: Full text of first article
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 11 06:41:32 UTC 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.25537 seconds